Sarah Granger

August 24, 2008

Blogging the Democratic National Convention This Week

>Thanks to the MOMocrats for initiating this great project… I’m going to Denver today, covering the Democratic National Convention for several online publications (mostly blogs) including:

Sairy
BlogHer
MOMocrats
Obama HQ Blog
WomenCount Blog
FutureCampaigns Blog
Silicon Valley Moms Blog
Huffington Post – Off the Bus
The Political Voices of Women

I’ll be spending time pretty much everywhere – at the convention itself, in the Big Tent, at the Unconventional Women event, the EMILY’s List events, Youth delegation events, California events, New Democrats Network events, getting together with Emerge alumni, meeting people and of course partying. I’m particularly looking forward to the Rocky Mountain Blogger Bash which looks to be a great way to kick back, and the Big Tent will be hopping I’m sure.

Follow the action via Twitter – sairy – and momocrats!

July 31, 2008

Women Bloggers vs. the New Boys’ Club

Filed under: blogging,politics,technology,women — Sarah Granger @ 12:41 am
Tags: , ,

When I was at BlogHer recently, there was a panel about how to be taken seriously as political bloggers. When asked at the beginning of the session what we wanted to get out of it, I said something about women being taken seriously as political bloggers in general, even knowing we probably didn’t have time to really get into that. The moderator, Morra Aarons, replied in kind with something along the lines of how that could take us all day.

It seems someone from the New York Times was there. Kara Jesella put up a post a few days ago about the issue, called “Blogging’s Glass Ceiling”. Unfortunately the post was under the Fashion & Style section (part of the problem with women being taken seriously – often women’s issues are lumped in there), but nevertheless, I’m happy the topic was written about, it’s a good article, and she made some interesting points about the issue, delving farther into it than I have to date.

July 22, 2008

List of Women Leaders in Tech Politics Is Up!

>I published a post earlier today that was a long time coming that lists many of the talented women working in the field of technology and politics at The Political Voices of Women, a blog launched in the past year by BlogHer and Care2 Contributing Editor, Catherine Morgan. The list I hope will become a living document like her list of what began as under 200 women bloggers who write about politics and now spans beyond 450.

July 20, 2008

BlogHer 2008

Filed under: blogging,politics,technology,women — Sarah Granger @ 2:24 pm
Tags: , ,

My friend, Glennia Campbell, has described the MOMocrats blog as “a conversation, not a shouting match” in reference to it being a collaborative environment for people to discuss policy vs. a heated, argumentative environment that the majority of political blogs can have and it struck me after being at BlogHer this week and talking to people who were simultaneously at Netroots Nation that the community we have really is special.

Not that I didn’t already know this, but I’m continually learning new reasons why the BlogHer network is unique, so I wanted to highlight what I felt and what I heard from others about the conference and the BlogHer site and sister sites. It’s not that these women don’t hiss at each other online or get riled up about things we care about, but there’s just an aura of cooperation and cordiality that I see more as a European advocacy style than American political discourse. When we meet in person, even if we disagree, we are pleasant and try to find common ground vs. seeking to one-up each other to score some imaginary points.

Coming to BlogHer for the second year, having worked on a few collaborative blogs and been out there in the blogosphere for a few years now was like a happy college reunion with just women – even women I’d never met who had read my work. Everyone is nice, everyone greets each other with hugs, people exchange genuine pleasantries vs. brushing each other off, and they take time to inquire about each other’s families, our health, etc.. Sure, there are suck-up scenarios and occasional rudeness, but it’s by far in the minority and overall I had a great time. Kudos again to the BlogHer organizers for bringing us all together.

May 30, 2008

Sebelius is Ready for DC and Coming to SF

Filed under: politics,sfbay area,women — Sarah Granger @ 4:44 am
Tags: , ,

As I wrote at MOMocrats today, I’m a big fan and supporter of Kathleen Sebelius. I may have mentioned that on this blog before as well. Essentially she took on a tough job as governor of Kansas – she’s a woman Democrat in a state traditionally governed by Republican white guys. Mostly anyway. Now she may be our next best hope for breaking the glass ceiling if Hillary Clinton can’t get the nomination. Kathleen Sebelius is on Obama’s short list for a VP running mate. And she’s a seasoned executive leader with a great record. So I’m excited to meet her tomorrow night in SF for an event where she’ll be speaking. I’ll be writing about that in the next couple of days.

There’s an interesting article by Ben Adler on Politico.com about the women who might be good VP options for Obama.

October 24, 2007

BlogHers Act for MOTHERS Act

Filed under: health,politics,women — Sarah Granger @ 9:20 pm
Tags: , ,

>We’ve all heard the stories – moms who are incapacitated by depression, launched into this state of anxiety, sadness, loneliness that they can’t seem to break out of – it’s called Postpartum Depression. But what many people don’t know is that this disease is much more complex than it sounds. In fact, one thing I haven’t seen mentioned in other posts about this is that depression related to pregnancy and childbirth can actually begin while you’re pregnant, and can affect the pregnancy itself. An important issue, to be sure, and I applaud the BlogHers Act organizers for choosing to endorse this.

The Senate is now reviewing an act, called the MOTHERS Act (“The Mom’s Opportunity To Access Help, Education, Research, and Support” for Postpartum Depression Act). This is one of those bills that just says – hey, let’s address this problem in a more cohesive fashion. I haven’t had a chance to read the text of the bill in detail yet, but from everything I’ve heard, it’s a worthy effort.

Rather than going on about this, I’ll direct you to Glennia Campbell’s post at the Silicon Valley Moms Blog where she goes into a bit more detail about the bill itself. Also, there are several other great personal stories on the Silicon Valley Moms Blog that I highly recommend reading, and of course at BlogHer.

Hillary in Hillsborough

>How could she not open her speech by talking about the weather on a day like yesterday? I could see across the Bay from this amazing property in Hillsborough – Redwood trees, gazebo and terraced gardens overlooked a tented lawn and the most perfect pool setting I’ve seen outside of Italy. Hillary Clinton, hopeful first woman president of the U.S. (applause please, everyone always applauds when this is mentioned and she’s in the room), came to speak to 200 people. She sparkled as she came out into the sun before entering the tent.

This was my second time to see Hillary Clinton in person – my first was in the spring at a much greater distance. This time she was 10 feet from me, close enough to see the expressions on her face and notice the details in her jewelry. As she spoke – about the economy, energy policy, healthcare, education, innovation and terrorism – I felt both humbled at the opportunity and awed by how one woman, her voice hoarse from speaking around the country, can persevere through so much to achieve this simple but incredible goal of leadership.

Although most people in the group I’d peg as moderate Democrats, we had a significant share of Republicans at the event, which made the discussions during and after the event a little different than when I saw Senator Clinton last in San Francisco. There was more talk about bipartisanship and incentives for businesses, more discussion about making college affordable for everyone, and encouraging innovation while simultaneously bringing down prices in the healthcare and energy sector.

Senator Clinton spoke at length about her top priorities both now as a senator and for the future as president. She emphasized the need for a new energy policy “for our security, our environment and our economy.” She jabbed at George Bush – “you cannot be a leader if no one is following.” She discussed how in order to make the sweeping changes that are necessary, we will have to “reform the government.”

When asked about how she would proceed in the “war on terror,” she had a 3 point plan beginning with regaining the “moral authority that we’ve lost.” “We’re now seeing the results ofthe deterioration in Pakistan,” she said. She thinks it’s the most dangerous place in the world right now, and she thinks they have nukes. “We’ve got to be vigilant – not fearful bit vigilant.”

On the environment, she said “it’s not going to be easy (major environmental progress) but we are making some positive changes,” talking about the time we have before the election. She lauded former Vice President Gore for his Nobel prize and for his efforts, but she said “I think Al would be happier with a policy than a prize,” knowing there is much work that needs to be done on her part in order to make the necessary changes.

About healthcare, Hillary brought out her vast knowledge of that area and cited several related statistics. “We can’t continue to spend more than anyone else in the world and not cover everyone.” She also advocated on behalf of electronic medical records, saying it would save us $44Billion/year. That figure I find staggering, but I’ve often wondered at the disorganized fashion of most medical records as a technologist. This could build and expand businesses too, from what I know of the industry. She talked about creating new jobs and coming to agreements with everyone in biotech, insurance, “big pharma” and the rest of us and how it’s unlikely the first step will be much more than a lot of compromise for everyone, but she indicated that may be the only way we can get everyone covered.

Senator Clinton spoke at great length about the challenges we have in education. She wants to provide pre-Kindergarten in 50 states. Because there’s a huge drop-out rate by the third grade. Third grade! It makes me sick to think about it. She thinks it’s deplorable what’s happening with the cost of college education. “A lot of people in mortgage crisis are there because they took out second mortgages to send their kids to college,” she said. She told stories about some of the people she’s met in that situation. She also said that the U.S. is declining in the percentage of people who are going to college now, compared to many other countries.

The senator and former first lady spoke for over an hour and took Q&A for at least 30 minutes more before being whisked away to catch a flight to her next event. Hosted by Cynthia Shuman and Dan Banks and Chaired by former California State Senator Jackie Speier, the lunch event lasted longer than I expected. Jackie Speier, as always, was radiant in her introduction and shared personal stories that illustrate why she’s supporting (and speaking on behalf of) Senator Clinton. There was some buzz as well about when Jackie will run for office next. Everyone in the room, of course, will be rooting for Jackie in her next race.

My mom, who happened to be in town this week, kindly sponsored my attendance to the event, since intimate political fundraisers (yes, 200 people is “intimate”) tend to cost a pretty penny. She came along with me, and I was able to find one friend at short notice who came as well. She’s one of the registered Republicans and she was impressed by Hillary’s knowledge of the issues, but she’s a tough sell (in this case because she knew one of the Republican candidates personally).

There’s still a lot of talk among women and men about whether Hillary’s electable – I thought that was past – but I guess not. The truth is we’ll never know until it happens. Polling results say it’s possible. I keep pointing-out to people that several of the first milestones in women’s political history were in cases where women took offices their husbands previously occupied, so there’s actually a strong precedent for this. People talk about her baggage, the smear campaigns against her, etc. and all I can say is it’s sad how much of our tax money has been wasted to turn the American public against one woman – a smart, dedicated, driven, amazing person – who can and is making a monumental difference in the state of our world.

These are not simple problems Senator Hillary Clinton faces and they don’t have simple solutions, nor is her list of adversaries small, but as I study her – through the debates, seeing her in person, reading what she writes, learning about her character from those who know her – I just can’t help but feel that we would be in good hands if and when she becomes president. She’s not sugar-coating what needs to be done and she’s not making promises she can’t keep. It’s refreshing to me both to see a woman and someone who presents a realistic perspective on our situation as a nation, but who brings people together in a problem-solving fashion to address these issues in a proactive, insightful way. At one point during her speech, she rebuked Bush’s choices as president and rhetorically asked, “how about appointing qualified people [to their posts in our government]?” Let’s start by electing one.


Also posted on the Silicon Valley Moms Blog.

October 19, 2007

Hillary Hopes to Breathe Life Back into Work-Life Balance

Filed under: business,global,health,parenting,politics,women — Sarah Granger @ 2:06 am
Tags: ,

>I used to think creating work-life balance was a matter of just taking control over your own life. And to a certain extent, it is. But there are factors in our society as Americans that have really gotten out-of-control. In other countries, new mothers have an opportunity to take real time off to spend with their new babies. New fathers can spend a little time at home too. And without fear of losing their jobs or taking pay cuts for doing it. Here, that’s hardly ever the case. After I became a parent, I realized work-life balance is actually very hard to come by here, especially in California where so many families need to have both parents working in order to just pay the mortgage.

Hillary Clinton, in a week of initiatives focused entirely on women, released a proposal to provide greater family leave options. The press release listed key components of the plan as creating a new State Family Leave Innovation Fund that will “expand paid leave across the country”. She also proposes extending FMLA to 13 Million more Americans and requiring sick leave of at least 7 days a year. (How does this work with lame PTO programs that lump vacation and sick days all into one, I wonder?) She’s promoting model workplaces and a federal telecommuting initiative (woo-hoo!), she has an affordable childcare component (no details here), and she’s working to prevent discrimination, particularly in the case of pregnant women.

This week, Hillary Clinton has also spoken on a number of women’s issues and for women’s organizations. This is a key component of her campaign, of course, since she’s the first viable woman candidate for president, but I personally believe it is much more than that. Having read a great deal about her now and having talked with and read stories about people who have known her well, it is clear to me that she has a deeply rooted commitment to women and families. This is a big part of why I support her candidacy.

It’s not just about Hillary Clinton being pro-choice, a woman, a mother, or particularly vocal on key issues generally identifiable as women’s issues like healthcare. Reading accounts from former staffers, she walks her talk. When she was First Lady, she allowed some of the people who worked for her to take long leaves for medical, pregnancy, post partum and childcare purposes, work flexible hours and in one rare case, bring a child to work.

If someone had told me all of that before I became a mother, perhaps I would have thought it was a weak policy or unprofessional. But now I realize how hard it really is to balance work and family in a way that is both satisfactory in allowing children to be properly nurtured and cared for while allowing parents to develop meaningful careers. Work-life balance is not some pie-in-the-sky idea that can only happen for the uber-wealthy or those who make major sacrifices. Look at Europe – it is possible. Hillary’s plan is just a first, much needed major step.

I am lucky to be able to attend a lunch this Monday in California that will be hosted by former California State Senator Jackie Speier, a woman who has been a long-time champion of women and families. I won’t go into too much detail here because I’ve blogged about this before, but Jackie Speier herself is admirable in many respects through all she’s been through personally. I worked for her briefly before I had to go on bed rest in my pregnancy and she was so understanding; I never would’ve expected that, but she knew I made the right choice in resigning my post so I could make sure my pregnancy was sustainable and that my daughter would be born healthy. I think it’s very fitting that she is hosting this event for Senator Clinton after a week of women’s initiatives. It shows the real commitment that Hillary has to these new proposals and I have no doubt we will make tons of progress in this area if she becomes president.


Also posted at BlogHer.

October 16, 2007

More from New York Times on Women Online & Politics

Filed under: blogging,politics,technology,women — Sarah Granger @ 12:56 am
Tags: ,

>Today, Katharine Seelye followed-up her post, “Women, Politics and the Internet” (I mentioned it two weeks ago – she quoted me from my comments to her original inquiry) with Part II introducing some of the bloggers I know and love locally who started the Momocrats blog (looking forward to working with you gals in the general election!)

Seeyle also asked readers to let her know what online outreach methods are working to reach out to women. I look forward to reading what she learns, but I think what Mindy Finn is doing with tagging for Mitt Romney’s campaign is certainly one good way. It still baffles me that so many campaigns are barely utilizing online tools, but it will happen.

October 3, 2007

Ellen Malcolm, Women Bloggers & Partnering with Women Candidates

>Today, I had the privilege of being invited to meet with Ellen Malcolm, Founder & President of EMILY’s List. EMILY’s List, for those who don’t know, is the largest PAC in the U.S. and also a phenomenal training organization for pro-choice Democratic women who want to run for office and work in campaigns. (I have also had the privilege of being through their Political Opportunity Program training in 2005 through Emerge and it is incredible. Highly recommended.) ‘EMILY’ stands for “Early Money Is Like Yeast” because early money in campaigns shows candidate viability and makes the difference between who stays in the race to win.

Thanks to Ramona Oliver, EMILY’s List Communications Director, a small group of us met over lunch in San Francisco and discussed how to utilize the Internet, particularly blogs, to get the message of women candidates out. Others in the group included Elisa Camahort of BlogHer, Gina Cooper of Netroots Nation, Elisa Batista of MotherTalkers, and Page Rockwell of the Salon.com “Broadsheet”. (A couple of others were invited, but being busy women, were already double-booked.) We spoke about our own experiences with online politics, the blogosphere, and how to get more women mobilized online.

Sitting across from Ellen Malcolm, who according to Wikipedia, was “named one of America’s most influential women by Vanity Fair (1998), one of the ’100 Most Important Women in America’ by Ladies’ Home Journal (1999), one of the ‘Women of the Year’ by Glamour (1992), and ‘Most Valuable Player’ by the American Association of Political Consultants,” gave me a real feeling of empowerment – knowing this woman created an organization that has launched over 11 senators, 55 congresswomen and 7 governors to their seats, not including all of the statewide women she helped attain public office. One woman, harnessing the power of other women, can really do all of that. I’ve heard these statistics before, and I’ve seen her speak at major events before, but somehow sitting at lunch together made me feel like what she does is more real. Hearing her speak on a personal level about her dream of seeing Hillary Clinton sworn in as our first woman president was really inspiring to me.

First, we talked about Hillary’s hair (just kidding – that never even crossed our minds). Seriously though, the topics ran the gamut from utilizing blog advertising to helping women bloggers learn more about working with the ‘mainstream’ media (see yesterday’s post relating to the New York Times article about women in politics online). The one point I wanted to get across to EMILY’s List was the importance of candidate and high-level buy-in about online tools for campaigning; in order to use them effectively, the campaign manager, communications director and state directors (if it’s national) need to totally grok why and how the net can help them win. Or at least they need enough confidence in the explanations given to them by people who do grok it who they feel they can trust. I got the sense that they already knew this, but it never hurts to have another person who’s worked in the field support that notion. I’ve found it’s absolutely essential in conducting a competitive campaign online.

It was a great lunch, and I enjoyed learning more about the other amazing women at the table as well. I hope I have the opportunity to work with all of them in one way or another in the future. I won’t spill the beans on everything else discussed, but let’s just say that I’m looking forward to mobilizing women for women to win in ’08 and beyond.

« Previous PageNext Page »

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.