Sarah Granger

June 15, 2011

Recent thoughts on open government and cybersecurity

The two biggest issue areas in IT policy that I’ve been working on the past few years include open government and cybersecurity. While they may sound like they’re in opposition, that’s not really the case. It is possible to have smart security and open government. Not everything can be open, not everything can be secured. The devil’s in the details.

Here’s a video of me talking about open government to the California Democratic Party’s Science & Technology Summit a few months ago: http://qik.com/swfs/qikPlayer5.swf

And on the cybersecurity side, I’ve been speaking on a lot of panels and providing training sessions trying to provide a framework where non-technical policy advisors and politicos can better understand the issues and proposed legislation.

This week I’ll be speaking at Netroots Nation on a panel entitled “Cyberwar: Wikileaks, Stuxnet, and the Proactive Progressive Response.” Last month, I spoke at the Truman National Security Project annual conference. Tomorrow I will be on WWL Radio’s “Think Tank” show for a few minutes talking about recent cyber attacks (Citibank, Lockheed, RSA, IMF, Sony, the Senate… the list keeps growing).

August 8, 2008

New Bi-Partisan Commission on U.S. Policy Toward Russia

Filed under: global,government,politics,security — Sarah Granger @ 10:25 pm
Tags:

>I’m happy to learn that Senator Hart will be co-chairing a new commission, announced this week, on U.S. policy toward Russia, along with Senator Hagel. The commission will produce a report for the next U.S. presidential administration. I look forward to reading it.

July 31, 2008

Finally Some Electrical Grid Protection

Filed under: government,security,technology — Sarah Granger @ 2:04 am
Tags:

The NERC (North American Electric Reliability Corporation) released a plan to deal with threats to grid security. Here’s more on that.

Government Still Can’t Handle Crypto

Filed under: politics,security,technology — Sarah Granger @ 2:02 am
Tags:

Is it 1995? No? 2008? Shocking, considering it seems not much has really happened in terms of crypto standards. Here’s the latest from Security Focus.

June 13, 2008

Security Hole Left Critical Infrastructure Vulnerable for Months

Filed under: environment,global,politics,security — Sarah Granger @ 8:21 pm
Tags: ,

>THIS is the kind of thing that keeps me awake at night…

That, and of course the general ineptitude of our government in terms of adequately dealing with the environmental crisis. Sigh.

May 24, 2008

The Internet is Helping Us in Natural Disasters, But Not Enough

I just published a new post on the Silicon Valley Moms Blog about what’s now being called the “Summit Fire” in the Santa Cruz Mountains near Watsonville. As a kid who grew-up in tornado country, I was completely clueless about wildfires until yesterday. Now I’ve been studying everything available online to track the blaze because it’s just a few miles from my sister’s dream home, her animals, and one of the most beautiful pieces of property I’ve ever seen in my life. I don’t know if I’m at liberty to describe it, but even if I did, still, it’s one of those places where you have to see it to believe it.

In any case, what I learned over the past 24 hours is that although we have 2700 firefighters on the scene to battle these fires, we only get semi-accurate updates about once a day about where the fires really are. People are in their homes waiting for calls or knocks on the door to evacuate. The neighbors who may or may not have phones or power communicate to the best of their ability, but they’re still not certain how far away it is. They see the smoke or possibly the flames, but it’s difficult to discern the distance. I found one live blog site where there was some minimal conversation via locals about what was going on to help sift through the mystery, but that was it.

So what I want to know is where do we go from here? What is the future of emergency response online? It has to be better than a few news sites and links. I’m not saying what we have now isn’t good. I’m happy we have the resources we do. But I know from my technology background that we can do better. We’ve put together phenomenal outreach programs and online activism to raise money and repair devastated areas. Why not create a place where communities can create ad-hoc emergency response sites as they arise? It’s possible something like this already exists, but not enough of us know about it.

What I found was one site for firefighters that said how to listen on short range scanners, some articles on the local newspaper site, a few maps that are only updated daily, the state fire site with data updated periodically (like every day or half a day), one satellite image of the fire, brief TV and radio coverage, a state road closures page, one live blog on the local news station web site where people exchanged notes, and a totally overloaded fire detection map at noaa.gov that nobody can use because everybody’s trying to get to it. And when watching the news and hearing from locals, it seems that the firefighters and police are keeping things barricaded for safety and not allowing any information transferral during the process.

Fires are dangerous, but if people can use personal weather stations and webcams like linked on the Weather Underground, why not have a system that applies locals as information centers online and includes what’s coming across the waves from emergency support services? Anyone out there have an idea of how to do this?

May 8, 2008

Internet Archive Wins Settlement with FBI

Filed under: advocacy,security,technology — Sarah Granger @ 2:36 pm
Tags: ,

>From the Chronicle, the Internet Archive recently won a settlement with the FBI about a “national security letter” i.e. government request for private information that was sent to them demanding they turn over data that they probably don’t even have. The Archive, legally considered an online library, for those who don’t know, was founded by Brewster Kahle who is also on the Board of the EFF. They keep books online as well as web sites, and they run the Wayback machine, a great tool for finding older versions of sites online. (Want to restore from an older backup of your site that’s gone? Try the Wayback machine.) Anyway, Brewster’s a good guy who just wants to share information with people, so it looks like after 4 months and $10,000 in donated legal services, the FBI got off his back. It’s a good article. I haven’t spoken with my EFF buddies about this particular case, but I’m guessing they’re happy a precedent’s been set to show others that the Patriot Act induced loophole can be fought.

February 2, 2008

Then What Exactly Does the Pentagon Do?

Filed under: politics,security — Sarah Granger @ 1:07 am
Tags: ,

Here’s a scary article – supposedly according to a retired Major General, the Pentagon’s disaster planning “couldn’t move a Girl Scout unit”. Well, in their defense, a bunch of girls is hard to herd, but this is really sad considering the billions we spend in tax dollars that ends up flowing through the Pentagon. So they send us to wars that blow things up, shuffle regimes around, kill people, make terrorism easier to hide and raise the price of gasoline and they push paper around under the auspices of “defense” and “disaster planning” is just a word. That’s fine. Anyone else ready to move to Antigua?

I’ve never worked in the Pentagon and I’m sure if I did, I’d have a different perspective, but I have worked in government and in security and I know that it’s a big bumbling bureaucracy. I also know that when things are urgent and important, it is possible to make progress. So here’s a note to them: things are urgent and important – there are still terrorists out there and there are other pseudo-natural (i.e. global warming-enhanced) disasters also waiting to occur.

This is a problem that’s much bigger than the Pentagon; it’s a problem that oozes through layers of government regarding who does what and when. News to lawmakers and government agencies: we the people don’t care who does it. We just want it done so we can have a safe, solid, secure, sensible country again.

As much as I can’t wait until we have a new president in office, I still acknowledge this problem is much bigger than one leader alone can solve. It takes a village and another village and another… ’nuff said, end rant.

November 17, 2007

Fly, Be Free for the Holidays… Or Not

Filed under: security,travel — Sarah Granger @ 5:31 am
Tags: ,

For those traveling over the holidays, check out this amusing comic at The Moderate Voice from The Hartford Courant. I still don’t understand why we had to pour out one ounce of water from my daughter’s sippy cup the last time we were going through a security line. (Of course the time before that, they let us through with a lot more… so random.)

October 1, 2007

Connecting With Elizabeth Edwards

>The Silicon Valley Moms Blog and sister sites (via conference call) Chicago Moms Blog and DC Metro Moms Blog had a unique opportunity to meet with Elizabeth Edwards in San Jose yesterday. As I’ve been contributing to the blog now for over a year, this was my second chance to meet with this remarkable woman, with whom many of us feel a connection. Except this time was different – she’s no longer on a book tour; she’s the wife of a presidential candidate. And while the discussion shifted to more specific policy issues than personal, it was still intimate and inviting.

As you can see from my liveblogging, we covered topics from tax brackets to math education to healthcare translators. And Elizabeth Edwards still loves us. (After one of my fellow contributors challenged her parenting choices a few weeks ago, there was some heated exchange that got picked-up by “Good Morning America” and taught our blogger and many others a lesson in taking care of what they post. Eventually Elizabeth and Rebecca made up, but it was an interesting few days for the blog.) And we still love her. Even if some of us won’t be voting for her husband.

In my case, as much as I really like Elizabeth and John Edwards, Hillary Clinton’s experience and her deep grasp of the issues is holding me strongly in her support. When it comes to national security, our place in the world, healthcare and the economy, I believe Hillary Clinton is our best choice. I like John Edward’s proposals and I especially like the fact he’s willing to talk about the environment and poverty more than most of the other candidates, but at the end of the day, with terrorists striking, hurricanes flooding and children dying all over the world, I’ll sleep better at night knowing Hillary and Bill Clinton are in the White House than John and Elizabeth Edwards. That said, I would still sleep very well knowing John and Elizabeth Edwards were in the White House, and if John Edwards wins the nomination, I will work extremely hard to make sure he wins the election next November.

So what is it about Elizabeth Edwards that makes us all like her so much? As we noticed when we met with her last year during her book tour, she has this down-to-earth quality that shows both her intelligence and her kindness, without any superficial attitude or put-on interest. She genuinely likes to meet new people, she has a wonderfully light way about her, and she sat down with us like we were all old friends. She’s also a little bit of a geek, hanging out on the blogs late at night in hotel rooms while traversing the campaign trail, which I find endearing. And she has dealt with major life challenges with the death of her son and her breast cancer, both of which have only added more depth to her persona and more commitment to the causes meaningful to her. I find her both incredibly inspiring and acutely insightful.

Where do we go now? Well, she’s promised to meet with the DC Metro Moms Blog and the Chicago Moms Blog as well, so hopefully that will transpire. The SVMoms still seek to meet with other candidates and their spouses, regardless of party, and I hope to help facilitate that. Although I realize it is a long shot because Elizabeth Edwards is unique in her connection to mommybloggers, I think the other candidates could benefit greatly from the discussion with the women in our network – all of whom are highly educated, qualified people in their own right, not just moms, and all of whom represent a key group of women voters.

Some of us from the SVMoms Blog spoke today with various members of the press about our meeting, and one of the points brought up was that this event really has no precedent. The reporter in one case couldn’t recall another time where a group of bloggers was given such intimate access to a candidate or candidate’s wife. I think this holds great promise for blogs to provide another vehicle for kitchen table and New Hampshire-style living room meet-and-greet democracy. If we can take these small conversations taking place in person and somehow transmit that feeling through the web, we might all feel a little closer to the national political process after all. Thank you Elizabeth.


Also posted here on the BlogHer site.

Next Page »

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.